For both cables, the screens of the USB connectors are connected – they ring. It turned out that the designers also worked. Black flat, microUSB – Ugreen US125 Both are half a meter, more precisely, including / not including Orico 510/435 mm Ugreen 535 connectors /475 I assumed that the only difference is that Ugreen has a microUSB connector, and it limits the current. Let’s see how a really cool cable works. This is an exception for Chinese cables. In the bins there were Ugreen US125 indicating the AWG22 wires and the promised current of 2A and ORICO AC5-05 with the same AWG22, but the passport current of 5A.
Contacts of all connectors shine with yellow metal
Anatomy of branded USB cables – https://jiji.co.ke/296-jacuzzi ORICO AC5-05 and Ugreen US125
Commercial packaging – Orico cardboard box, Ugreen – Plastic bag. The tampering technique has been previously tested on cats – see a recent USB cable review, testing technique: pressure gauge, Chinese ohms, fire test and copper wire micrometry It is interesting, I repeat, that with the same declared cross section, the advertised current differs by 2.5 times Additional review just about this Ugreen
For comparison, the lousy test connector from the last review White round section with green plastic connectors, typeC – ORICO AC5-05 By the way, to cable, which we cut in the last review, also shine Not saved. Then the cables were sold for $0.99, now they are more expensive – but there will still be discounts.
Not to gut all non-names – he promised to open a couple of excellent cables. Transport packaging – JD bubble bag
Also see the table in the old review with non-destructive measurements of the resistance of many cables on the same method Multi-review of cables from the sale of 11.11 with a microbonus: measuring the resistance It had this Oriko, but at 1 m. Oriko I did not expect any surprises, I just have to answer for the market. Ugrin And more passes through typeC in Orico, so marketers frolic.